Is the 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 9 SUVs
1stof 9
- Yes. Top half on 5 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 72.6 cu ft.
- 1st of 9 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (1st of 9), rear legroom (2nd of 9).
- Weakest: mpg (7th of 9, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $48,350 | 4th of 9 | 63% | |
| Best combined mpg | 17 mpg | 7th of 9 | 13% | |
| Most horsepower | 420 hp | 3rd of 9 | 50% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 72.6 cu ft | 1st of 9 | 100% | |
| Rear legroom | 42.0 in | 2nd of 9 | 75% | |
| Max towing | 8,400 lb | 3rd of 9 | 63% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Chevrolet Tahoe 72.6 cu ft
- Jeep Wagoneer 70.8 cu ft
- Ford Expedition 63.6 cu ft
- Chevrolet Traverse 57.8 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 25.5 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 23.6 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 17.2 cu ft
Show all 9
- Nissan Armada 16.5 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 9 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree