Is the 2023 Ford Expedition a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 13 SUVs
4thof 13
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 63.6 cu ft.
- 4th of 13 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (4th of 13), price (5th of 13).
- Weakest: towing (10th of 13).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $54,755 | 5th of 13 | 67% | |
| Best combined mpg | 19 mpg | 7th of 13 | 42% | |
| Most horsepower | 440 hp | 4th of 13 | 67% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 63.6 cu ft | 4th of 13 | 75% | |
| Rear legroom | 41.5 in | 7th of 13 | 50% | |
| Max towing | 6,300 lb | 10th of 13 | 25% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Cadillac Escalade 72.9 cu ft
- Chevrolet Tahoe 72.6 cu ft
- Jeep Wagoneer 70.8 cu ft
- Ford Expedition 63.6 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 57.5 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 25.5 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 23.6 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
Show all 13
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 17.2 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 16.6 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 16.5 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 13 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree