Is the 2025 Ford Expedition a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 14 SUVs
5thof 14
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 60.8 cu ft.
- 5th of 14 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (2nd of 13), power (4th of 14).
- Weakest: mpg (9th of 14).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $57,400 | 7th of 14 | 54% | |
| Best combined mpg | 19 mpg | 9th of 14 | 38% | |
| Most horsepower | 440 hp | 4th of 14 | 77% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 60.8 cu ft | 5th of 14 | 69% | |
| Rear legroom | 41.1 in | 8th of 14 | 46% | |
| Max towing | 9,600 lb | 2nd of 13 | 92% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Chevrolet Tahoe 72.5 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 72.5 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Wagoneer 70.9 cu ft
- Jeep Wagoneer 70.8 cu ft
- Ford Expedition 60.8 cu ft
- Lexus TX 57.4 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 23.0 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 22.9 cu ft
Show all 14
- Chevrolet Traverse 22.9 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 22.0 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 20.4 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 17.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 14 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree