Is the 2025 Chevrolet Suburban a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
1stof 22
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 93.8 cu ft.
- 1st of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (1st of 22), rear legroom (3rd of 22).
- Weakest: mpg (19th of 20, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $62,000 | 16th of 24 | 35% | |
| Best combined mpg | 17 mpg | 19th of 20 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 420 hp | 11th of 23 | 45% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 93.8 cu ft | 1st of 22 | 100% | |
| Rear legroom | 42.0 in | 3rd of 22 | 90% | |
| Max towing | 8,200 lb | 5th of 21 | 75% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Chevrolet Suburban 93.8 cu ft
- Jeep Wagoneer L 85.3 cu ft
- Jeep Wagoneer 70.8 cu ft
- Ford Expedition 60.8 cu ft
- Lexus GX 45.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Lincoln Aviator 42.7 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
Show all 22
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Jaguar F PACE 32.1 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 30.9 cu ft
- Jeep Wagoneer S 30.6 cu ft
- Audi Q6 e-tron 30.2 cu ft
- Cadillac LYRIQ 28.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 5 N 26.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 25.9 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 20.4 cu ft
- Porsche Macan 17.2 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
No figure: Genesis GV80, Mercedes-Benz GLE.
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree