Is the 2026 Chevrolet Suburban a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
6thof 23
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 41.5 cu ft.
- 6th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (4th of 22), cargo (6th of 23).
- Weakest: mpg (17th of 19, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $63,700 | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Best combined mpg | 17 mpg | 17th of 19 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 420 hp | 13th of 24 | 35% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 41.5 cu ft | 6th of 23 | 77% | |
| Rear legroom | 42.0 in | 4th of 22 | 81% | |
| Max towing | 8,200 lb | 9th of 24 | 61% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Jeep Grand Wagoneer L 88.8 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Wagoneer 70.8 cu ft
- Ford Expedition 60.8 cu ft
- Lexus GX 45.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Chevrolet Suburban 41.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV80 38.7 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 35.8 cu ft
Show all 23
- Audi Q7 35.7 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 30.9 cu ft
- Jeep Wagoneer S 30.6 cu ft
- Jeep Recon 30.3 cu ft
- Cadillac LYRIQ 28.0 cu ft
- Cadillac LYRIQ V 28.0 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 25.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 25.4 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 Sportback 25.4 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 9 21.9 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 20.4 cu ft
- Porsche Macan 17.2 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz GLE.
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree