Is the 2026 Ford Expedition a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 13 SUVs
3rdof 13
- Yes. Top half on 5 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 60.8 cu ft.
- 3rd of 13 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (2nd of 13), cargo (3rd of 13).
- Weakest: mpg (7th of 12, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $57,700 | 7th of 13 | 50% | |
| Best combined mpg | 19 mpg | 7th of 12 | 36% | |
| Most horsepower | 440 hp | 4th of 13 | 75% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 60.8 cu ft | 3rd of 13 | 83% | |
| Rear legroom | 41.1 in | 7th of 13 | 50% | |
| Max towing | 9,600 lb | 2nd of 13 | 92% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Chevrolet Tahoe 72.5 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Wagoneer 70.8 cu ft
- Ford Expedition 60.8 cu ft
- Lexus TX 57.4 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 57.3 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 56.3 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 46.9 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 25.5 cu ft
Show all 13
- Buick Enclave 22.9 cu ft
- Chevrolet Traverse 22.9 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 20.4 cu ft
- Cadillac VISTIQ 15.2 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 13 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree