Is the 2020 Ford Expedition a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 7 SUVs
1stof 7
- Yes. Top half on 6 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 63.6 cu ft.
- 1st of 7 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (1st of 7), rear legroom (1st of 7).
- Weakest: price (4th of 7).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $48,990 | 4th of 7 | 50% | |
| Best combined mpg | 19 mpg | 2nd of 7 | 83% | |
| Most horsepower | 400 hp | 2nd of 7 | 67% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 63.6 cu ft | 1st of 7 | 100% | |
| Rear legroom | 42.6 in | 1st of 7 | 100% | |
| Max towing | 9,200 lb | 1st of 7 | 100% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Expedition 63.6 cu ft
- Chevrolet Tahoe 51.7 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 23.6 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 18.9 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 16.6 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 16.5 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 15.3 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 7 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree