Is the 2020 Ford Explorer a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
5thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 5 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 47.9 cu ft.
- 5th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (2nd of 24), mpg (4th of 24).
- Weakest: price (15th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $32,765 | 15th of 24 | 39% | |
| Best combined mpg | 28 mpg | 4th of 24 | 87% | |
| Most horsepower | 400 hp | 2nd of 24 | 91% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 47.9 cu ft | 5th of 24 | 83% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.0 in | 11th of 24 | 52% | |
| Max towing | 5,600 lb | 4th of 24 | 87% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Chevrolet Traverse 57.8 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Tahoe 51.7 cu ft
- Toyota Highlander 48.4 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 47.7 cu ft
- Subaru Ascent 47.0 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 46.0 cu ft
Show all 24
- Acura MDX 43.4 cu ft
- Acura MDX Sport Hybrid 43.4 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 41.7 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport 40.3 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 34.1 cu ft
- Subaru Outback 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Murano 32.1 cu ft
- Chevrolet Blazer 30.5 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 23.6 cu ft
- Lexus RX 23.0 cu ft
- Kia Telluride 21.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 18.0 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.2 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 16.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
- Dodge Journey 10.7 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree