Is the 2020 Chevrolet Traverse a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 12 SUVs
1stof 12
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 57.8 cu ft.
- 1st of 12 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (1st of 12), cargo (1st of 12).
- Weakest: mpg (9th of 12, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29,800 | 1st of 12 | 100% | |
| Best combined mpg | 21 mpg | 9th of 12 | 9% | |
| Most horsepower | 310 hp | 4th of 12 | 64% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 57.8 cu ft | 1st of 12 | 100% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.4 in | 10th of 12 | 9% | |
| Max towing | 5,000 lb | 5th of 12 | 18% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Chevrolet Traverse 57.8 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Tahoe 51.7 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 47.7 cu ft
- Subaru Ascent 47.0 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 46.0 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 23.6 cu ft
Show all 12
- Kia Telluride 21.0 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.2 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 16.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 12 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree