Is the 2020 Chevrolet Tahoe a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
4thof 22
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 51.7 cu ft.
- 4th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (4th of 22), towing (4th of 22).
- Weakest: mpg (19th of 22, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $43,000 | 12th of 22 | 48% | |
| Best combined mpg | 18 mpg | 19th of 22 | 10% | |
| Most horsepower | 355 hp | 8th of 22 | 62% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 51.7 cu ft | 4th of 22 | 86% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.0 in | 11th of 22 | 43% | |
| Max towing | 8,400 lb | 4th of 22 | 81% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Expedition 63.6 cu ft
- Chevrolet Traverse 57.8 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Tahoe 51.7 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 47.7 cu ft
- Subaru Ascent 47.0 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 46.0 cu ft
Show all 22
- Acura MDX 43.4 cu ft
- Acura MDX Sport Hybrid 43.4 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 34.0 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 23.6 cu ft
- Kia Telluride 21.0 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 18.9 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 18.0 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 16.5 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.2 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 16.0 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 15.3 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 22 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree