Is the 2025 Chevrolet Tahoe a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 11 SUVs
1stof 11
- Yes. Top half on 5 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 72.5 cu ft.
- 1st of 11 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (1st of 11), rear legroom (2nd of 11).
- Weakest: mpg (10th of 11, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $53,000 | 5th of 11 | 60% | |
| Best combined mpg | 17 mpg | 10th of 11 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 420 hp | 4th of 11 | 50% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 72.5 cu ft | 1st of 11 | 90% | |
| Rear legroom | 42.0 in | 2nd of 11 | 80% | |
| Max towing | 8,400 lb | 4th of 10 | 56% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Chevrolet Tahoe 72.5 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 72.5 cu ft
- Jeep Wagoneer 70.8 cu ft
- Ford Expedition 60.8 cu ft
- Lexus TX 57.4 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 23.0 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 22.9 cu ft
- Chevrolet Traverse 22.9 cu ft
Show all 11
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 20.4 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 17.2 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 11 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree