Is the 2020 Volvo XC90 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
9thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 34.1 cu ft.
- 9th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (4th of 23), power (7th of 24).
- Weakest: rear legroom (18th of 22, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $48,350 | 11th of 24 | 57% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 4th of 23 | 77% | |
| Most horsepower | 400 hp | 7th of 24 | 70% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 34.1 cu ft | 9th of 24 | 65% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.0 in | 18th of 22 | 14% | |
| Max towing | 5,000 lb | 12th of 24 | 30% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model Y 68.0 cu ft
- Toyota Highlander 48.4 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Acura MDX 43.4 cu ft
- Acura MDX Sport Hybrid 43.4 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 41.2 cu ft
- Lincoln Nautilus 37.2 cu ft
Show all 24
- Volvo XC90 34.1 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 34.0 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.2 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.1 cu ft
- Lexus RX 23.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 19.7 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 16.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
- Lexus GX 11.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree