Is the 2020 Nissan Armada a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 7 SUVs
6thof 7
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 16.5 cu ft.
- 6th of 7 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (3rd of 7), rear legroom (2nd of 7).
- Weakest: mpg (5th of 7, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $47,500 | 3rd of 7 | 67% | |
| Best combined mpg | 16 mpg | 5th of 7 | 17% | |
| Most horsepower | 390 hp | 4th of 7 | 50% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 16.5 cu ft | 6th of 7 | 17% | |
| Rear legroom | 41.0 in | 2nd of 7 | 67% | |
| Max towing | 8,500 lb | 2nd of 7 | 67% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Expedition 63.6 cu ft
- Chevrolet Tahoe 51.7 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 23.6 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 18.9 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 16.6 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 16.5 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 15.3 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 7 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree