Is the 2023 Volvo XC90 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 21 SUVs
7thof 21
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 35.6 cu ft.
- 7th of 21 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (2nd of 19), cargo (7th of 21).
- Weakest: power (21st of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $56,000 | 9th of 24 | 65% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 2nd of 19 | 94% | |
| Most horsepower | 312 hp | 21st of 24 | 13% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 35.6 cu ft | 7th of 21 | 70% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.0 in | 18th of 21 | 15% | |
| Max towing | 5,952 lb | 15th of 22 | 33% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Acura MDX 48.4 cu ft
- Lexus GX 46.7 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 37.7 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- Genesis GV80 34.9 cu ft
Show all 21
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 32.0 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Lexus RX 29.6 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Cadillac LYRIQ 28.0 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 27.1 cu ft
- Maserati Grecale 20.1 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 14.5 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, Mercedes-Benz GLE, Polestar 3.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree