Is the 2023 Volvo C40 Recharge a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 16 SUVs
16thof 16
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 15.0 cu ft.
- 16th of 16 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (2nd of 16), towing (3rd of 12).
- Weakest: cargo (16th of 16).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $55,300 | 15th of 16 | 7% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 402 hp | 2nd of 16 | 87% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 15.0 cu ft | 16th of 16 | 0% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.1 in | 13th of 16 | 13% | |
| Max towing | 3,970 lb | 3rd of 12 | 82% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 Prime 33.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.7 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 5 27.2 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 24.8 cu ft
Show all 16
- Genesis GV60 24.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.5 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Volvo C40 Recharge 15.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 16 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree