Is the 2021 Volvo XC90 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 21 SUVs
7thof 21
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 34.1 cu ft.
- 7th of 21 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (3rd of 23), cargo (7th of 21).
- Weakest: rear legroom (18th of 21, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $49,000 | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 3rd of 23 | 86% | |
| Most horsepower | 400 hp | 8th of 24 | 65% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 34.1 cu ft | 7th of 21 | 70% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.0 in | 18th of 21 | 10% | |
| Max towing | 5,000 lb | 14th of 23 | 32% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 43.3 cu ft
- Lincoln Nautilus 37.2 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 36.3 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 34.1 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 34.0 cu ft
Show all 21
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.2 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- Lexus RX 23.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 19.7 cu ft
- Toyota Highlander 16.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
- Lexus GX 11.6 cu ft
No figure: BMW X6, Genesis GV80, Mercedes-Benz GLE.
SUVs in 2021: 145. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree