Is the 2025 Volvo XC90 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
10thof 22
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 35.6 cu ft.
- 10th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (4th of 19), price (9th of 24).
- Weakest: power (19th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $57,400 | 9th of 24 | 65% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 4th of 19 | 83% | |
| Most horsepower | 312 hp | 19th of 24 | 22% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 35.6 cu ft | 10th of 22 | 57% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.0 in | 16th of 21 | 25% | |
| Max towing | 5,000 lb | 14th of 24 | 30% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota 4Runner 48.4 cu ft
- Toyota Highlander 48.4 cu ft
- Lexus GX 45.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Kia EV9 43.5 cu ft
- Subaru Ascent 42.1 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 37.5 cu ft
Show all 22
- Lincoln Nautilus 36.4 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Nissan Murano 32.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 31.9 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV80 Coupe 29.3 cu ft
- Audi Q8 e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Cadillac LYRIQ 28.0 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.3 cu ft
- Audi Q8 e-tron Sportback 27.2 cu ft
- Toyota Crown Signia 25.8 cu ft
- Polestar 3 17.1 cu ft
No figure: Genesis GV80, Mercedes-Benz GLE.
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree