Is the 2025 Jaguar F PACE a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
2ndof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 32.1 cu ft.
- 2nd of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (2nd of 24), towing (2nd of 19).
- Weakest: rear legroom (14th of 21, tied with 3).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $57,000 | 15th of 24 | 39% | |
| Best combined mpg | 24 mpg | 7th of 15 | 36% | |
| Most horsepower | 567 hp | 4th of 23 | 86% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 32.1 cu ft | 2nd of 24 | 96% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.2 in | 14th of 21 | 20% | |
| Max towing | 5,291 lb | 2nd of 19 | 94% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Lexus RZ 34.9 cu ft
- Jaguar F PACE 32.1 cu ft
- BMW X3 31.5 cu ft
- INFINITI QX50 31.4 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 30.9 cu ft
- Audi Q6 e-tron 30.2 cu ft
- Audi SQ6 e-tron 30.2 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
Show all 24
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
- Audi Q5 Sportback 27.6 cu ft
- INFINITI QX55 26.9 cu ft
- Audi Q6 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ6 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 5 N 26.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 25.9 cu ft
- Kia EV6 24.4 cu ft
- Subaru Solterra 23.8 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Porsche Macan 17.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLC 13.8 cu ft
- VinFast VF8 13.2 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree