Is the 2026 Jaguar F PACE a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
3rdof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 32.1 cu ft.
- 3rd of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (3rd of 24), cargo (3rd of 24).
- Weakest: price (19th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $57,000 | 19th of 24 | 22% | |
| Best combined mpg | 24 mpg | 5th of 16 | 47% | |
| Most horsepower | 567 hp | 3rd of 24 | 91% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 32.1 cu ft | 3rd of 24 | 91% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.2 in | 12th of 20 | 26% | |
| Max towing | 5,291 lb | 3rd of 20 | 89% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Lexus RZ 34.9 cu ft
- Toyota bZ Woodland 33.8 cu ft
- Jaguar F PACE 32.1 cu ft
- BMW X3 31.5 cu ft
- Subaru Trailseeker 31.3 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 30.9 cu ft
- Tesla Model Y 30.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.0 cu ft
Show all 24
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
- Audi Q5 27.6 cu ft
- Audi Q5 Sportback 27.6 cu ft
- Cadillac OPTIQ 26.0 cu ft
- Cadillac OPTIQ V 26.0 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 25.4 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 Sportback 25.4 cu ft
- Subaru Solterra 23.8 cu ft
- Lexus NX 22.7 cu ft
- Maserati Grecale 20.1 cu ft
- Polestar 4 18.6 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio 18.5 cu ft
- Porsche Macan 17.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLC 13.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree