Is the 2022 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 11 SUVs
5thof 11
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.5 cu ft.
- 5th of 11 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (2nd of 9), cargo (5th of 11).
- Weakest: mpg (7th of 9, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $44,700 | 9th of 11 | 20% | |
| Best combined mpg | 23 mpg | 7th of 9 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 296 hp | 6th of 11 | 40% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.5 cu ft | 5th of 11 | 60% | |
| Rear legroom | 33.8 in | 9th of 11 | 20% | |
| Max towing | 3,968 lb | 2nd of 9 | 63% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- Lexus UX 21.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.5 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona N 19.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
Show all 11
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Volvo C40 Recharge 14.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 11 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree