Is the 2023 Alfa Romeo Tonale a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
13thof 24
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 22.9 cu ft.
- 13th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (8th of 23), cargo (13th of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (13th of 16, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $44,995 | 18th of 24 | 26% | |
| Best combined mpg | 24 mpg | 13th of 16 | 13% | |
| Most horsepower | 285 hp | 15th of 24 | 39% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 22.9 cu ft | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.0 in | 8th of 23 | 68% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 11th of 18 | 18% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 Prime 33.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.7 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 5 27.2 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
Show all 24
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 24.8 cu ft
- Genesis GV60 24.0 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Nissan Ariya 22.8 cu ft
- Lexus NX 22.7 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Volvo C40 Recharge 15.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree