Is the 2026 Alfa Romeo Tonale a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
19thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 22.9 cu ft.
- 19th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (5th of 23), price (12th of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (17th of 18).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $37,495 | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Best combined mpg | 24 mpg | 17th of 18 | 6% | |
| Most horsepower | 268 hp | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 22.9 cu ft | 19th of 24 | 22% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.0 in | 5th of 23 | 77% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 37.8 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.4 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.8 cu ft
- Audi Q3 29.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
Show all 24
- Audi Q4 e-tron 26.1 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.0 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 25.3 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 24.0 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Subaru Uncharted 23.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo EX40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree