Is the 2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
10thof 24
- Top half on 2 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 29.7 cu ft.
- 10th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (1st of 24), cargo (10th of 24).
- Weakest: rear legroom (13th of 23).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $37,795 | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 480 hp | 1st of 24 | 100% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 29.7 cu ft | 10th of 24 | 61% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.1 in | 13th of 23 | 45% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Kia Sportage 39.6 cu ft
- Honda CR-V 39.3 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue 36.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 33.7 cu ft
- Jeep Cherokee 33.6 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- BMW X3 31.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-50 31.4 cu ft
Show all 24
- Mitsubishi Outlander 30.6 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Subaru Forester 29.6 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
- Toyota bZ 27.7 cu ft
- Audi Q5 27.6 cu ft
- Audi Q5 Sportback 27.6 cu ft
- Volkswagen Tiguan 26.5 cu ft
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- Acura ADX 24.4 cu ft
- Kia EV6 24.4 cu ft
- Subaru Solterra 23.8 cu ft
- Lexus NX 22.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio 18.5 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree