Is the 2025 Alfa Romeo Tonale a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
20thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 22.9 cu ft.
- 20th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (7th of 22), mpg (6th of 20).
- Weakest: cargo (20th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $36,495 | 10th of 24 | 61% | |
| Best combined mpg | 29 mpg | 6th of 20 | 63% | |
| Most horsepower | 285 hp | 11th of 24 | 57% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 22.9 cu ft | 20th of 24 | 17% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.0 in | 7th of 22 | 71% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 11th of 18 | 18% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco 38.3 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.2 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 29.1 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
Show all 24
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 24.8 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Genesis GV60 24.0 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree