Is the 2020 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
11thof 23
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.7 cu ft.
- 11th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (9th of 23), price (11th of 23).
- Weakest: mpg (15th of 23, tied with 3).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $22,595 | 11th of 23 | 55% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 15th of 23 | 23% | |
| Most horsepower | 168 hp | 13th of 23 | 45% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.7 cu ft | 11th of 23 | 55% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.3 in | 9th of 23 | 59% | |
| Max towing | 1,600 lb | 11th of 17 | 38% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 30.9 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
Show all 23
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22.6 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-3 17.8 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 23 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree