Is the 2026 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 19 SUVs
14thof 19
- No. Top half on 1 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.7 cu ft.
- 14th of 19 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (4th of 19), rear legroom (10th of 19).
- Weakest: mpg (13th of 15, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $24,995 | 4th of 19 | 83% | |
| Best combined mpg | 26 mpg | 13th of 15 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 168 hp | 13th of 19 | 33% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.7 cu ft | 14th of 19 | 28% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.3 in | 10th of 19 | 44% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 30.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 25.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 25.3 cu ft
Show all 19
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 24.0 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Subaru Uncharted 23.0 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Nissan LEAF 20.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo EX30 12.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 19 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree