Is the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 17 SUVs
13thof 17
- No. Top half on 1 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.7 cu ft.
- 13th of 17 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (5th of 17), power (10th of 17).
- Weakest: mpg (15th of 16, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $23,745 | 5th of 17 | 75% | |
| Best combined mpg | 26 mpg | 15th of 16 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 168 hp | 10th of 17 | 44% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.7 cu ft | 13th of 17 | 25% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.3 in | 10th of 16 | 33% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 30.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 25.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
Show all 17
- Nissan Kicks Play 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 19.6 cu ft
- Volvo EX30 12.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 17 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree