Is the 2022 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 21 SUVs
12thof 21
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.7 cu ft.
- 12th of 21 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (3rd of 21), rear legroom (10th of 21).
- Weakest: mpg (12th of 21, tied with 4).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $21,795 | 3rd of 21 | 90% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 12th of 21 | 25% | |
| Most horsepower | 168 hp | 12th of 21 | 45% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.7 cu ft | 12th of 21 | 45% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.3 in | 10th of 21 | 50% | |
| Max towing | 1,600 lb | 8th of 14 | 46% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 26.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
Show all 21
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 21 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree