Is the 2021 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 21 SUVs
11thof 21
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.7 cu ft.
- 11th of 21 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (4th of 21), cargo (11th of 21).
- Weakest: mpg (13th of 21, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $20,995 | 4th of 21 | 85% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 13th of 21 | 30% | |
| Most horsepower | 168 hp | 13th of 21 | 40% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.7 cu ft | 11th of 21 | 50% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.3 in | 11th of 21 | 45% | |
| Max towing | 1,600 lb | 10th of 14 | 31% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 30.9 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
Show all 21
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-3 17.8 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2021: 145. The photo shows the 21 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree