Is the 2021 Mazda CX-3 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 18 SUVs
16thof 18
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 17.8 cu ft.
- 16th of 18 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (1st of 18), price (4th of 18).
- Weakest: cargo (16th of 18).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $20,790 | 4th of 18 | 82% | |
| Best combined mpg | 31 mpg | 1st of 18 | 88% | |
| Most horsepower | 148 hp | 15th of 18 | 18% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 17.8 cu ft | 16th of 18 | 12% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.0 in | 14th of 18 | 24% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 1st of 11 | 40% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
Show all 18
- Ford EcoSport 20.9 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-3 17.8 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2021: 145. The photo shows the 18 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree