Is the 2020 Mazda CX-3 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 19 SUVs
17thof 19
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 17.8 cu ft.
- 17th of 19 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (3rd of 19), price (4th of 19).
- Weakest: cargo (17th of 19).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $20,640 | 4th of 19 | 83% | |
| Best combined mpg | 31 mpg | 3rd of 19 | 89% | |
| Most horsepower | 148 hp | 13th of 19 | 33% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 17.8 cu ft | 17th of 19 | 11% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.0 in | 14th of 19 | 28% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 2nd of 14 | 54% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22.6 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
Show all 19
- Ford EcoSport 20.9 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-3 17.8 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 19 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree