Is the 2020 Mazda CX-30 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
15thof 23
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 20.2 cu ft.
- 15th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (6th of 23), power (7th of 23).
- Weakest: mpg (10th of 23, tied with 5).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $21,900 | 6th of 23 | 77% | |
| Best combined mpg | 28 mpg | 10th of 23 | 36% | |
| Most horsepower | 186 hp | 7th of 23 | 73% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 20.2 cu ft | 15th of 23 | 36% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.3 in | 11th of 23 | 50% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 4th of 19 | 50% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 30.9 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
Show all 23
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22.6 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-3 17.8 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 23 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree