Is the 2022 Mazda CX-30 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
17thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 20.2 cu ft.
- 17th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (4th of 24), price (7th of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (19th of 23, tied with 3).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $22,500 | 7th of 24 | 74% | |
| Best combined mpg | 26 mpg | 19th of 23 | 5% | |
| Most horsepower | 227 hp | 4th of 24 | 87% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 20.2 cu ft | 17th of 24 | 30% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.3 in | 11th of 24 | 52% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 3rd of 16 | 60% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 26.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
Show all 24
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Lexus UX 21.7 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree