Is the 2024 Mazda CX-30 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 20 SUVs
17thof 20
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 20.2 cu ft.
- 17th of 20 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (6th of 20), price (8th of 20).
- Weakest: cargo (17th of 20).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $24,995 | 8th of 20 | 63% | |
| Best combined mpg | 29 mpg | 10th of 20 | 42% | |
| Most horsepower | 227 hp | 6th of 20 | 68% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 20.2 cu ft | 17th of 20 | 16% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.3 in | 14th of 19 | 22% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 29.1 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 25.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
Show all 20
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 24.0 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Kia Niro 22.8 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2024: 189. The photo shows the 20 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree