Is the 2021 Mazda CX-30 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
16thof 23
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 20.2 cu ft.
- 16th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (6th of 23), price (8th of 23).
- Weakest: cargo (16th of 23).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $22,050 | 8th of 23 | 68% | |
| Best combined mpg | 28 mpg | 12th of 23 | 41% | |
| Most horsepower | 227 hp | 6th of 23 | 73% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 20.2 cu ft | 16th of 23 | 32% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.3 in | 13th of 23 | 41% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 3rd of 17 | 44% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 30.9 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
Show all 23
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Lexus UX 21.7 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-3 17.8 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2021: 145. The photo shows the 23 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree