Is the 2026 Mazda CX-30 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
19thof 23
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 20.2 cu ft.
- 19th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (7th of 23), power (8th of 23).
- Weakest: cargo (19th of 23).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $26,375 | 7th of 23 | 73% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 12th of 19 | 22% | |
| Most horsepower | 227 hp | 8th of 23 | 68% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 20.2 cu ft | 19th of 23 | 18% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.3 in | 14th of 23 | 36% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 37.8 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 30.0 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.8 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 25.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
Show all 23
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 25.3 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 24.0 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Subaru Uncharted 23.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Nissan LEAF 20.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo EX30 12.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 23 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree