Is the 2026 Subaru Crosstrek a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
21stof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 20.0 cu ft.
- 21st of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (5th of 21), towing (1st of 11).
- Weakest: cargo (21st of 24, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $26,995 | 10th of 24 | 61% | |
| Best combined mpg | 36 mpg | 5th of 21 | 80% | |
| Most horsepower | 194 hp | 15th of 24 | 39% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 20.0 cu ft | 21st of 24 | 9% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.7 in | 15th of 24 | 39% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 1st of 11 | 80% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 37.8 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 30.0 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.8 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
Show all 24
- Chevrolet Trax 25.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 25.3 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 24.0 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Subaru Uncharted 23.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Nissan LEAF 20.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree