Is the 2023 Mazda CX-30 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
19thof 23
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 20.2 cu ft.
- 19th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (4th of 23), power (5th of 23).
- Weakest: cargo (19th of 23).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $22,950 | 4th of 23 | 86% | |
| Best combined mpg | 29 mpg | 12th of 22 | 43% | |
| Most horsepower | 227 hp | 5th of 23 | 77% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 20.2 cu ft | 19th of 23 | 18% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.3 in | 13th of 22 | 38% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 3rd of 17 | 56% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 36.3 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 29.1 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
Show all 23
- Toyota Corolla Cross 26.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Kia Niro 22.8 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 23 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree