Is the 2023 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 21 SUVs
14thof 21
- No. Top half on 1 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.7 cu ft.
- 14th of 21 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (5th of 21), rear legroom (11th of 20).
- Weakest: mpg (15th of 20, tied with 4).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $22,995 | 5th of 21 | 80% | |
| Best combined mpg | 26 mpg | 15th of 20 | 5% | |
| Most horsepower | 168 hp | 14th of 21 | 35% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.7 cu ft | 14th of 21 | 35% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.3 in | 11th of 20 | 42% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Nissan Rogue Sport 36.3 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 26.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
Show all 21
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Kia Niro 22.8 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 21 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree