2023 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 0-60 time, horsepower and power-to-weight
0-60 mph, quickest trim
7.5s
- GT 2.4 AWC 4WD, 168 hp.
- Estimate from power and weight.
- 0-60: rank 156 of 176 SUVs (2023).
- Horsepower: rank 168 of 176 SUVs (2023).
Every trim: 0-60 and power-to-weight
| Trim | Engine | hp | Torque | Curb weight | hp per ton | lb per hp | 0-60 and basis | Transmission | Drivetrain | MSRP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT 2.4 AWC 4WD | 2.4L 4-cyl | 168 hp | 167 lb-ft | 3,296 lb | 102 | 19.6 | 7.5 sEstimate | CVT | 4WD | $28,045 |
| GT AWD | 2.4L 4-cyl | 168 hp | 167 lb-ft | 3,296 lb | 102 | 19.6 | 7.5 sEstimate | CVT | AWD | $28,415 |
| S AWD | 2.0L 4-cyl | 148 hp | 145 lb-ft | 3,263 lb | 91 | 22.0 | 8.3 sEstimate | CVT | AWD | $23,160 |
| ES 2.0 AWC 4WD | 2.0L 4-cyl | 148 hp | 145 lb-ft | 3,263 lb | 91 | 22.0 | 8.3 sEstimate | CVT | 4WD | $24,995 |
| ES AWD | 2.0L 4-cyl | 148 hp | 145 lb-ft | 3,263 lb | 91 | 22.0 | 8.3 sEstimate | CVT | AWD | $25,160 |
| LE 2.0 AWC 4WD | 2.0L 4-cyl | 148 hp | 145 lb-ft | 3,263 lb | 91 | 22.0 | 8.3 sEstimate | CVT | 4WD | $25,945 |
| LE AWD | 2.0L 4-cyl | 148 hp | 145 lb-ft | 3,263 lb | 91 | 22.0 | 8.3 sEstimate | CVT | AWD | $26,315 |
| SE 2.0 AWC 4WD | 2.0L 4-cyl | 148 hp | 145 lb-ft | 3,263 lb | 91 | 22.0 | 8.3 sEstimate | CVT | 4WD | $27,245 |
| SE AWD | 2.0L 4-cyl | 148 hp | 145 lb-ft | 3,263 lb | 91 | 22.0 | 8.3 sEstimate | CVT | AWD | $27,615 |
| Ralliart 2.0 AWC 4WD | 2.0L 4-cyl | 148 hp | 145 lb-ft | 3,263 lb | 91 | 22.0 | 8.3 sEstimate | CVT | 4WD | $27,795 |
| RALLIART AWD | 2.0L 4-cyl | 148 hp | 145 lb-ft | 3,263 lb | 91 | 22.0 | 8.3 sEstimate | CVT | AWD | $28,045 |
| S 2.0 AWC FWD | 2.0L 4-cyl | 148 hp | 145 lb-ft | 3,120 lb | 95 | 21.1 | 8.7 sEstimate | CVT | FWD | $22,995 |
Ton = 2,000 lb. Curb weight, no passengers.
Estimates: a fit on 7,236 tested times, using power and weight. Typical error 0.3 s.
Engines offered
2 engines offered.
| Engine | Trims | hp | Cheapest trim | MSRP | Price step | Fuel a year | Fuel vs base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0L 4-cyl | 10 | 148 hp | S 2.0 AWC FWD | $22,995 | Base | $1,477 | Base |
| 2.4L 4-cyl | 2 | 168 hp | GT 2.4 AWC 4WD | $28,045 | +$5,050 | $1,536 | +$59 |
12,000 miles a year. Gas $3.20.
Turbo: only when the engine or trim name says so.
Transmission
CVT: yes. All 12 trims.
| Transmission | Trims | Cheapest trim | MSRP | Quickest 0-60 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVT | 12 | S 2.0 AWC FWD | $22,995 | 7.5 s |
Rivals with a geared automatic
Nearest in price to the S 2.0 AWC FWD ($22,995).
| Model | Trim | Transmission | MSRP | 0-60 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-30 | 2.5 S AWD | 6-speed automatic | $22,950 | 8.7 s |
| Chevrolet Trailblazer | LS AWD | 9-speed automatic | $24,100 | N/A |
| Volkswagen Taos | S FWD | 8-speed automatic | $24,155 | 8.4 s |
Rivals with more hp and better mpg
Compared with the S 2.0 AWC FWD: 148 hp, 26 mpg, $22,995. Other makes, SUVs, within 15% of the price.
| Model | Trim | hp | mpg | MSRP | 0-60 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-30 | 2.5 S AWD | 191 hp | 29 mpg | $22,950 | 8.7 s |
| Toyota Corolla Cross | L FWD | 169 hp | 32 mpg | $23,610 | 7.9 s |
| Subaru Crosstrek | AWD | 152 hp | 30 mpg | $23,645 | 7.9 s |
| Honda HR-V | LX 2WD | 158 hp | 28 mpg | $23,800 | 8.4 s |
| Chevrolet Trailblazer | LS AWD | 155 hp | 28 mpg | $24,100 | N/A |
| Volkswagen Taos | S FWD | 158 hp | 31 mpg | $24,155 | 8.4 s |
Cheapest 6 of 10.
Outlander Sport by year
Which is faster?
Quickest trim of each car, unless you pick a trim.
2023 Mazda CX-30: 1.2 s quicker to 60.
| Measure | 2023 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport | 2023 Mazda CX-30 |
|---|---|---|
| Trim | GT 2.4 AWC 4WD | Turbo Premium AWD |
| 0-60 | 7.5 s | 6.3 s |
| Basis | Estimate | Tested |
| Horsepower | 168 hp | 227 hp |
| Curb weight | 3,296 lb | N/A |
| hp per ton | 102 | N/A |
| lb per hp | 19.6 | N/A |
| MSRP | $28,045 | $33,800 |
What this cannot tell you
0-60 times vary by test. Estimates use power and weight only.
Fuel cost uses EPA combined ratings.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree