Is the 2025 Mazda CX-30 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
20thof 24
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 20.2 cu ft.
- 20th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (8th of 24), power (7th of 24).
- Weakest: cargo (20th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $25,195 | 8th of 24 | 70% | |
| Best combined mpg | 29 mpg | 12th of 23 | 36% | |
| Most horsepower | 227 hp | 7th of 24 | 70% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 20.2 cu ft | 20th of 24 | 17% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.3 in | 15th of 23 | 32% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 30.0 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 29.1 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
Show all 24
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 25.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks Play 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 19.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.2 cu ft
- Volvo EX30 12.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree