Is the 2025 Volkswagen Taos a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
8thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 27.9 cu ft.
- 8th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (8th of 24), price (10th of 24).
- Weakest: power (16th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $25,495 | 10th of 24 | 61% | |
| Best combined mpg | 31 mpg | 8th of 24 | 61% | |
| Most horsepower | 174 hp | 16th of 24 | 35% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 27.9 cu ft | 8th of 24 | 70% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.9 in | 10th of 23 | 59% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Hyundai Tucson 38.7 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 30.0 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 29.1 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
Show all 24
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 25.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks Play 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 19.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.2 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree