Is the 2023 Volkswagen Taos a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
7thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 27.9 cu ft.
- 7th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (7th of 24), price (9th of 24).
- Weakest: power (18th of 24, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $24,155 | 9th of 24 | 65% | |
| Best combined mpg | 31 mpg | 10th of 23 | 50% | |
| Most horsepower | 158 hp | 18th of 24 | 22% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 27.9 cu ft | 7th of 24 | 74% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.9 in | 10th of 23 | 59% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Hyundai Tucson 38.7 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 36.3 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 29.1 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
Show all 24
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 26.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Kia Niro 22.8 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree