Is the 2022 Volkswagen Taos a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
8thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 27.9 cu ft.
- 8th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (8th of 24), cargo (8th of 24).
- Weakest: power (17th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $23,495 | 8th of 24 | 70% | |
| Best combined mpg | 31 mpg | 8th of 23 | 59% | |
| Most horsepower | 158 hp | 17th of 24 | 30% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 27.9 cu ft | 8th of 24 | 70% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.9 in | 10th of 24 | 61% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Honda CR-V 39.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 38.7 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.6 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
Show all 24
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 26.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Lexus UX 21.7 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree