Is the 2022 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
17thof 24
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 23.4 cu ft.
- 17th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (6th of 24), cargo (17th of 24).
- Weakest: towing (12th of 21, tied with 7).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $23,695 | 6th of 24 | 78% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 15th of 23 | 27% | |
| Most horsepower | 152 hp | 21st of 24 | 13% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 23.4 cu ft | 17th of 24 | 30% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.3 in | 19th of 24 | 22% | |
| Max towing | 1,500 lb | 12th of 21 | 10% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Honda CR-V 39.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 38.7 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue 36.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander 33.5 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
Show all 24
- Chevrolet Equinox 29.9 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.6 cu ft
- Subaru Forester 28.9 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 26.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Lexus UX 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree