Is the 2026 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
18thof 24
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 23.4 cu ft.
- 18th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (8th of 24), rear legroom (17th of 24).
- Weakest: towing (10th of 15, tied with 4).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $27,695 | 8th of 24 | 70% | |
| Best combined mpg | 26 mpg | 20th of 22 | 10% | |
| Most horsepower | 152 hp | 22nd of 24 | 9% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 23.4 cu ft | 18th of 24 | 26% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.1 in | 17th of 24 | 30% | |
| Max towing | 1,500 lb | 10th of 15 | 7% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Kia Sportage 39.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 38.7 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.8 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue 36.5 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.8 cu ft
- Subaru Forester 29.6 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
Show all 24
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Volkswagen Tiguan 26.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 25.6 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 25.3 cu ft
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 24.0 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Subaru Uncharted 23.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Buick Envista 20.7 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree