Is the 2020 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
12thof 24
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 22.6 cu ft.
- 12th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (11th of 24), cargo (12th of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (16th of 24, tied with 3).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $22,995 | 11th of 24 | 57% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 16th of 24 | 22% | |
| Most horsepower | 152 hp | 16th of 24 | 30% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 22.6 cu ft | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.3 in | 16th of 23 | 32% | |
| Max towing | 1,500 lb | 13th of 18 | 24% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 44.0 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 30.9 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
Show all 24
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22.6 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-3 17.8 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree