Is the 2020 Buick Encore a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
17thof 23
- No. Top half on 0 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 18.8 cu ft.
- 17th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (13th of 22), price (14th of 23).
- Weakest: power (21st of 23, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $23,200 | 14th of 23 | 41% | |
| Best combined mpg | 28 mpg | 8th of 23 | 41% | |
| Most horsepower | 138 hp | 21st of 23 | 5% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 18.8 cu ft | 17th of 23 | 27% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.8 in | 13th of 22 | 43% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 44.0 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 31.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
Show all 23
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22.6 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Ford EcoSport 20.9 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 19.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Buick Encore 18.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 18.7 cu ft
- Jeep Renegade 18.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-3 17.8 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- FIAT 500X 14.1 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 23 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree