Is the 2020 Hyundai Tucson a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
5thof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 31.0 cu ft.
- 5th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (5th of 24), price (10th of 24).
- Weakest: towing (18th of 20, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $23,550 | 10th of 24 | 61% | |
| Best combined mpg | 25 mpg | 23rd of 24 | 4% | |
| Most horsepower | 181 hp | 14th of 24 | 39% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 31.0 cu ft | 5th of 24 | 83% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.2 in | 9th of 23 | 59% | |
| Max towing | 1,000 lb | 18th of 20 | 0% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 44.0 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Subaru Forester 31.1 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 30.9 cu ft
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Chevrolet Equinox 29.9 cu ft
Show all 24
- GMC Terrain 29.6 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Jeep Cherokee 25.8 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 25.3 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22.6 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree