Is the 2021 Hyundai Tucson a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
7thof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 31.0 cu ft.
- 7th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (7th of 24), price (8th of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (22nd of 24, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $23,700 | 8th of 24 | 70% | |
| Best combined mpg | 25 mpg | 22nd of 24 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 181 hp | 14th of 24 | 35% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 31.0 cu ft | 7th of 24 | 74% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.2 in | 11th of 24 | 52% | |
| Max towing | 1,000 lb | 19th of 21 | 0% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Honda CR-V 39.2 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue 36.5 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Subaru Forester 31.1 cu ft
- Hyundai Tucson 31.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 30.9 cu ft
Show all 24
- Kia Sportage 30.7 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
- Jeep Cherokee 25.8 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.3 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue Sport 22.9 cu ft
- Lexus UX 21.7 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 19.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2021: 145. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree